Extended learning time shows promise, but more study needed


On Board Online • November 19, 2012

By Paul Heiser
 Senior Research Analyst

Expanded learning time programs, such as longer school years and school days, show promise in improving educational outcomes, but research is too limited to make broad generalizations about their effectiveness, according to a recently published study commissioned by the Wallace Foundation.

The Child Trends study was based on an analysis of previous studies of three expanded learning time models: Extended School Day (ESD), which lengthens the school day beyond the typical 6.5 hours; Extended School Year (ESY), which lengthens the school year beyond the standard 180 school days; and Expanded Learning Opportunities (ELO), which provides extra academic help during or outside of schools or outside of regular operating school-day hours.

Findings:

  • Extended learning time programs generally have a greater impact on low-income, low-performing, ethnic minority or other disadvantaged students.
  • Poor implementation has no effect or even negative effects on children and youth.

To read the entire study, go to http://www.wallacefoundation.org.




Back to top